Hey there everyone! Welcome back to Movie Soapbox, the little corner of the internet that only you and I and that guy sleeping in the corner over there know about. This is the place where we find underappreciated indie films and we make sense of them. Today? We are doing a deep dive on Infinity Pool, a movie so viscerally, morally unhinged that the studio suits who acquired it for distribution were probably stress-eating through the entire back half and calling their lawyers before the credits rolled.
Before we go any further, you need to hear this clearly, in Moviesoapbox’s clear voice, not in a little yellow warning box: this film has body horror, sexual content, violence that is designed to make you feel bad about yourself for watching it, and a breastfeeding scene that will end at least one dinner party. If your preferred flavor of mind-bender is Primer or Time lapse, the kind where the disturbing thing is a diagram you can’t quite solve, walk away right now and come back next week. If you’re still reading, we’re going in all the way.
Brandon Cronenberg made Infinity Pool in 2023, and the fact that it exists in the form it exists in, uncut, with an NC-17 rating that got trimmed only for theatrical, with Mia Goth doing things on camera that most A-list adjacents would have had their agents suppress in pre-production, is itself a minor miracle worth acknowledging before we talk about a single frame of the actual film. Films like this one don’t usually make it out the other side looking like themselves. They get sanded. They get “elevated.” They get a third act that a test audience in Burbank can follow without spilling their drink. The fact that this one didn’t is the story behind the story, and we’ll come back to it. But first, the film itself.
Infinity Pool Movie Deep Dive Walkthrough
Cronenberg’s last film, Possessor, gave the industry a pretty clear read on what this director was going to keep doing, which is make movies about bodies that betray their owners and institutions that profit from that betrayal. When you see that pattern, and you’re a distributor, you have a choice. You can attach enough commercial scaffolding to the project that you feel safe, a recognizable lead, a marketable genre hook, a runtime under 100 minutes, or you can just ride it and hope the festival circuit does your marketing for you. Infinity Pool got Alexander Skarsgård and Mia Goth, both of whom have enough indie credibility that their presence doesn’t read as studio interference, it reads as casting. That distinction matters enormously in terms of how much a director gets to keep. A Guy Pearce, a Skarsgård, a Mia Goth, they’re a force field. The project looks serious before anyone has to fight for it. The version of this film that gets made without those names attached probably has a different third act. Softer. More explicable. Less of the thing that makes it worth talking about.
James Foster is a one-book author, and the one book wasn’t very good. His wife Em is the money. They are at a resort in Li Tolqa, a fictional nation that is doing extremely specific and accurate work as a stand-in for any number of real places where wealthy foreigners are bused into a walled compound in the middle of the night, live in a bubble for a week, and are bused back out without ever having actually been in the country. Cronenberg has talked about this directly, a vacation he took where he realized the resort was essentially a sovereign state of comfort pitched inside a nation of poverty, a Disneyland with a flag and a fence and men with guns on the perimeter. The film uses that architecture not as a political essay but as a pressure cooker. The rules inside the compound are different. The rules outside the compound will turn out to be different in a way nobody warned James about.
A woman named Gabi, played by Mia Goth at a frequency that should technically require a permit, introduces herself as a fan of James’s book. She has a husband named Alban. The four of them go out. They drink. They go to a beach outside the compound, which they were explicitly told not to do. On the drive back, James, drunk, hits and kills a man crossing the road. Gabi shuts down any conversation about calling the police. They go back to the resort. The next morning, James is arrested.
Here is where Li Tolqa’s justice system becomes the entire film. The penalty for James’s crime is execution, carried out by the eldest son of the man he killed. Except, and this is the proposition the entire movie is built on, if you have money, you can pay to have a clone of yourself created. The clone stands in for you. The clone gets executed. You watch.
James pays. A clone of James, let’s call him James2, is brought into an arena. A teenage boy stabs him to death, repeatedly, while James1 and Em watch from the stands. Em is completely destroyed by this. She wants to leave immediately. James has lost his passport and can’t go anywhere. He is also, and this is the turn, not destroyed at all. He is electrified.

The Infinity Pool Group and what they’ve actually been doing
Gabi and Alban are not tourists who accidentally fell into this. They are annual returnees. They have a whole crew of people like them, wealthy visitors who come back to Li Tolqa specifically to commit crimes, watch their clones die for those crimes, and go back to their lives feeling cleansed and invincible. The cloning and execution loop is, for them, a sacrament. It has produced god-complexes of a very specific and very ugly variety. They are beyond consequence. They’ve paid for that. Literally paid, in cash, to a government office.
Gabi recruits James into this group. He goes along. He participates in increasingly brutal, degrading acts because why not, there will be a clone to eat the punishment. Until one day the group has James beat and urinate on a man, and James realizes mid-act that the man is James3. Gabi staged it. She wanted to watch him destroy himself, or a version of himself, as a kind of initiation. James draws a line here. He finds his hidden passport, tries to run, and Gabi shoots him in the leg.
He makes it to a local farm. A family tries to help him. Gabi and the group find him. They bring out what they describe as a dog, a man on a leash, collared, and that man is James4. The message is clear: to fully transcend, to fully cross over into whatever Gabi’s group has become, James has to kill this version of himself. He refuses. James4 attacks. James kills him. Bare hands. After, Gabi holds him and breastfeeds him.
We need to stop on that for a second.
The Infinity Pool Breastfeeding scene
The reading that holds up is the most literal one: James has just been reborn. He committed a kind of spiritual infanticide on himself and came out the other side as something new, something that has now killed its own reflection and survived. Gabi, who has been his shepherd through this entire process, who recruited him and tested him and shot him in the leg when he tried to leave, is now feeding him. The blood imagery is intentional. He is being initiated into something that has its own rituals, its own theology, its own way of marking the moment you stop being what you were. Cronenberg isn’t being provocative for its own sake here, which is the charge you’ll see leveled a lot. He’s completing a very specific symbolic circuit. The film has been about sin, substitution, and what happens to a person when the mechanism of absolution is available at any price point. The breastfeeding is the baptism. The fact that it’s disturbing is the point.
The Mechanics of Infinity Pool – How Do We Know Who is Who?
The film is upfront about this being unknowable, and the in-world characters admit it openly. When you go into the Infinity Pool and come out the other side with a double, nobody, not the scientists running the process, not the government administering it, not you, can tell you which one is the original and which one is the copy. It could be that the real James dies in the arena every single time and what’s walking around is always a new print. It could be random. The film refuses to resolve this, and it’s not coyness, it’s the actual thesis. The question of which James is real is the same question as whether the moral weight of a crime follows the body or the consciousness. Neither answer feels clean. Both answers are supposed to make you uncomfortable.
What the film is clear about is the ending, and this is where almost all of the write-ups get it wrong.
Infinity Pool Movie Ending Explained
The group is heading to the airport. Everyone is making travel small talk, weekend plans, things to do when they get home. James, or the James who has been through all of this, is visibly wrecked. He boards the plane. He goes home. That is one James. Back at the resort, in the rain, another James sits alone and waits.
Two of them made it out of that final confrontation. One went to the airport. One stayed. The one who stayed is not at peace, is not cleansed, is not reborn into Gabi’s amoral vacation club. He is sitting in the rain with a very specific emotional weather system that the film leaves unnamed but that reads, clearly, as something that hasn’t finished yet. He is waiting for the monsoon season to end. He is waiting for whatever comes next. That is the ending. Sitting in the wreckage of what the resort actually is, unable to leave it, which is of course exactly what the resort was designed to produce.
Infinity Pool Movie Theory Explanations
Infinity Pool Movie Theory Number 1 – Poverty Tourism
The first reads it as a straightforward critique of wealthy tourism and the moral insulation that money buys, the cloning is a literalization of how the rich have always been able to purchase consequences out of existence. If you’ve ever traveled to South America, gone llama backpacking, you know… you get the idea of the itch that this theory is trying to scratch right away.
Infinity Pool Movie Theory Number 2 – Artistic Impotence
The second reads it as a film about artistic impotence and masculine ego, James is a failed writer who has never had real stakes in his life and the resort gives him the only narrative he’s ever truly inhabited, one that turns out to be a horror story. Fragile masculinity and artistic rage. You get where this one is going I’m sure.
Infinity Pool Movie Theory Number 2 – Theological Justice
The third reading, which you see a lot in the serious forum threads, treats the film as genuinely theological, the Infinity Pool as a corruption of the Christian substitutionary atonement model, a system where a sacrificial stand-in absorbs punishment on behalf of the guilty, and what Cronenberg is asking is what happens to the soul of the guilty party when that substitution is available not through grace but through a government fee schedule.
Moviesoapbox’s Preferred Read on the Movie Infinity Pool
It’s my take that the third reading is the right one, and the other two readings are true inside nestled snuggly inside theory number three. The reason the film is called Infinity Pool, the reason the cloning mechanism is given no scientific explanation and is treated as simply a thing the government does, the reason the execution is always performed by the victim’s son, the reason Gabi breastfeeds James after he kills his double, all of it is structured as a theology, not a social satire. Cronenberg built a religion and then showed you what the congregation looks like after twenty years of practice. The answer is all kinds of feral. Amused. Completely unmoored from the thing that makes shared social life possible. The indictment of wealth is real but it’s downstream of the religious critique. What Cronenberg is saying is that the mechanism of forgiveness, when it becomes transactional, when you can buy absolution rather than earn it, doesn’t produce peace. It produces appetite. Every sin forgiven cheaply makes the next sin easier to commit and harder to feel. The man sitting in the rain at the end of this film is not the man who left on the plane. Neither of them is who James Foster was when he checked into the resort. The pool has no bottom.
That is what Brandon Cronenberg got onto the screen, in a year when the studios were busy deciding which superhero gets a prequel. It survived because a handful of people with enough cache said yes and meant it. Most films like this don’t get that. Remember that while you’re watching it. Want a few more movies in this same vein as Infinity Pool? Moviesoapbox has got you covered:
🎬 If You Liked This…
- Borgman — a comfortable wealthy family gets infiltrated by something that reveals the violence already living underneath their surface, same class horror different mythology
- Funny Games — violence as entertainment for people who have enough distance from consequences to treat it as a game, the film implicates you in watching it
- Audition — a man who believes he controls the situation discovering the situation was never his to control, and then the third act happens

